NUnit2043
Use ComparisonConstraint for better assertion messages in case of failure
Topic | Value |
---|---|
Id | NUnit2043 |
Severity | Info |
Enabled | True |
Category | Assertion |
Code | ComparisonConstraintUsageAnalyzer |
Description
Using ComparisonConstraint will lead to better assertion messages in case of failure.
Motivation
Using Is.GreaterThan
constraint will lead to better assertion messages in case of failure,
so this analyzer marks all usages of a comparison operators >
, >=
, <
and <=
where it is possible to replace with the appropriate comparison constraint.
[Test]
public void Test()
{
ClassicAssert.True(actual > expected);
}
How to fix violations
The analyzer comes with a code fix that will replace ClassicAssert.True(actual > expected)
with
Assert.That(actual, Is.GreaterThan(expected))
. So the code block above will be changed into
[Test]
public void Test()
{
Assert.That(actual, Is.GreaterThan(expected));
}
Configure severity
Via ruleset file
Configure the severity per project, for more info see MSDN.
Via .editorconfig file
# NUnit2043: Use ComparisonConstraint for better assertion messages in case of failure
dotnet_diagnostic.NUnit2043.severity = chosenSeverity
where chosenSeverity
can be one of none
, silent
, suggestion
, warning
, or error
.
Via #pragma directive
#pragma warning disable NUnit2043 // Use ComparisonConstraint for better assertion messages in case of failure
Code violating the rule here
#pragma warning restore NUnit2043 // Use ComparisonConstraint for better assertion messages in case of failure
Or put this at the top of the file to disable all instances.
#pragma warning disable NUnit2043 // Use ComparisonConstraint for better assertion messages in case of failure
Via attribute [SuppressMessage]
[System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.SuppressMessage("Assertion",
"NUnit2043:Use ComparisonConstraint for better assertion messages in case of failure",
Justification = "Reason...")]